Tobias Lindhe, Jan Södersten () and Ann Öberg ()
Additional contact information
Tobias Lindhe: Swedish Ministry of Finance, Postal: SE-103 33 Stockholm, Sweden
Jan Södersten: Department of Economics, Postal: Uppsala University, P.O. Box 513, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden
Ann Öberg: National Institute of Economic Research, Postal: Box 3116, SE-103 62 Stockholm, Sweden
Abstract: This paper analyzes the economic effects of different income splitting rules for closely held corporations and sole proprietorships/partnerships in a tax system with a dual income tax. We conclude that the tax rules for closed corporations offer roughly the same cost of capital as for widely held corporations. Compared to corporate firms, the cost of capital is lower for sole proprietorships/partnerships, because the income-splitting rules both neutralize the impact of the high labor income tax and avoid the two-tier taxation on the corporate form of organization. Adding risk to the model shows that closely held corporations have a lower cost of capital than would be the case without income-splitting rules.
Keywords: Dual income taxation; small business taxation; tax avoidance; income splitting; cost of capital
22 pages, July 15, 2003
Full text files
wp2003_19.pdf
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Ulrika Öjdeby ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:uunewp:2003_019This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:17:37.