Working Papers in Economics and Statistics,
Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Economics and Statistics

Abstract: In competitive settings, disparities in player strength are common. It is intuitively unclear whether a stronger player would opt for larger or smaller effort compared to weaker players. Larger effort could leverage their strength, while lower effort might be justified by their higher probability of winning regardless of effort. We analyze contests with three or more players, exploring when stronger players exert larger or lower effort. To rank efforts, it suffices to compare marginal utilities in situations where efforts are equal. Effort ranking depends on differences in hazard rates (which are smaller for stronger players) and reversed hazard rates (which are larger for stronger players). Compared to weaker players, stronger players choose larger effort in winner-takes-all contests and lower effort in loser-gets-nothing contests. Effort rankings can be non-monotonic in contests with several identical prizes, and they depend on the slopes of players’ pdfs in contests with linear prize structure.

Keywords: contest theory; heterogeneity; player strength

JEL-codes: C72; D74; D81

Language: English

36 pages, March 6, 2024

Full text files

24-04_Player-strength-and-effort-in-contests.pdf  Full text

Download statistics

• Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Economics and Statistics
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Thomas Giebe ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:vxesta:2024_004This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:17:41.