Working papers in Transport Economics,
CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI)

Abstract: The paper challenges the existing sustainable transport literature. Most sustainable transport plans focus on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in either one region or country and this neglects two handicaps of strong unilateral action. The first is that climate is a global commons problem so a strong binding international climate agreement is unlikely. The second is that a unilateral reduction of oil consumption by a limited number of countries will be partially, or even completely, offset by market responses – in some circumstances, cumulative emissions may even come earlier (the “green paradox”). When a coalition of the willing reduces oil use in the transport sector, this will delay rather than reduce total emissions. This requires rethinking climate policies for the transport sector: what policies remain cost effective in reducing greenhouse gas emissions?

Keywords: Climate change; Sustainable transport; Oil consumption; International negotiation

JEL-codes: R42; R48

21 pages, First version: January 20, 2014. Revised: September 29, 2014. Earlier revisions: September 29, 2014, September 29, 2014.

Full text files

CTS2014-2.pdf  

Download statistics

Published as

Jonas Eliasson and Stef Proost, (2015), 'Is sustainable transport policy sustainable?', Transport Policy, vol 37, pages 92-100

• CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI)
• VTI
• KTH
• See also working Papers, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI)
• Ordering Working Papers
• Instructions for Authors
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to CTS ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:ctswps:2014_002This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:14:29.