Working papers in Transport Economics,
CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI)

Abstract: One policy that is believed to increase the rate of innovation and the level of productivity is to move from Design-bid-build contracts (DBB) to Design-Build contracts (DB). A common view is that the latter provides the contractor more degrees of freedom to enable innovation. This hypothesis consists of two steps, first that DB actually has more degrees of freedom and secondly that more degrees of freedom leads to more innovation. This paper focuses on the first step and is based on a review of five road construction projects – two labelled DBB and three DB. It is demonstrated that there is a gap between the textbook definition of the two types of contracts and the actual design of the examples. The degrees of freedom for the contractor are restricted in both DB and DBB contracting and no significant difference in this dimension could be established. Based on this lack of difference in the five projects, the expectation of innovation for the labelled contracts cannot be settled. Some possible rational reasons for the client to restrict the degrees of freedom are also suggested.

Keywords: Innovation; Contracting; Design Bid Build (DBB); Design and Build (DB)

JEL-codes: D86; H57; L74

15 pages, October 24, 2014

Full text files

CTS2014-20.pdf  

Download statistics

• CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI)
• VTI
• KTH
• See also working Papers, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI)
• Ordering Working Papers
• Instructions for Authors
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to CTS ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:ctswps:2014_020This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:14:30.