Jesper Lindé: Research Department, Postal: Sveriges Riksbank, SE-103 37 Stockholm, Sweden
Abstract: In this paper, I try to shed some new light on the "puzzle" why the Lucas critique, believed to be important by most economists, seems to have received very little empirical support. I use a real business cycle model to verify that the Lucas critique is quantitatively important in theory, and to examine the properties of the super exogeneity test, which is used to detect the applicability of the Lucas critique in practice. The results suggest that the super exogeneity test is not capable of detecting the relevance of Lucas critique in practice in small samples.
33 pages, First version: March 5, 1999. Revised: May 25, 2000. Earlier revisions: March 9, 1999, November 1, 1999, April 11, 2000, May 3, 2000.
Full text files
hastef0311.pdf.zip Full text
hastef0311.pdf Full text
hastef0311.ps.zip PostScript file Full text
hastef0311.ps PostScript file Full text
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Helena Lundin ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
This page generated on 2018-03-27 10:24:46.