Mikael Stenkula () and Niklas Wykman
Additional contact information
Mikael Stenkula: Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN), Postal: Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Box 55665, SE-102 15 Stockholm, Sweden
Niklas Wykman: Örebro University School of Business and, Postal: Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Box 55665, SE-102 15 Stockholm, Sweden
Abstract: Sweden’s dual income tax (DIT) system, introduced through the 1990–1991 tax reform, relies on income-splitting rules for active owners of closely held corporations to limit income shifting. This article quantifies how the tax system has shaped investment incentives and tax neutrality since the reform. Using an extended King–Fullerton framework, we construct annual marginal effective tax rate (METR) series for a marginal investment, distinguishing financing through new equity, retained earnings, and debt, and allowing for different rates of return and owner income positions. The results show substantial non-neutrality and pronounced time variation, especially for new equity. Debt is typically tax-favored, while new equity can be favored over retained earnings at low returns but becomes less favorable at higher returns as more surplus is taxed as labor income. Inflation materially affects long-run comparisons and short-run fluctuations. The analysis is relevant for other DIT countries designing anti-shifting regimes for owner-managed firms.
Keywords: Cost of capital; Marginal effective tax rates; Dual income tax; Income splitting rules
Language: English
32 pages, September 8, 2026
Full text files
wp1565.pdfFull text
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Elisabeth Gustafsson ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:iuiwop:1565This page generated on 2026-09-14 09:33:13.