Mason Hoadley () and Neelambar Hatti ()
Additional contact information
Mason Hoadley: Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, Postal: Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, Box 201, S-221 00 Lund, Sweden
Neelambar Hatti: Department of Economic History, Lund University, Postal: Department of Economic History, Lund University, Box 7083, S-220 07 Lund, Sweden
Abstract: Studies of relations binding ruled and ruler over the form and content of revenue assessment during the colonial era are not lacking. Rather, the intellectual challenge lies in ascertaining the degree to which the relevant economic institutions of the subjected regions in southern Asia constituted continuity of tradition, modifications thereof, or completely alien constructs. Meeting that challenge is hindered by inequality of information revealing ‘before’ and ‘after’ conditions; an embarrassment of riches in information on the latter contrasts to poverty of the former. The present paper aims at least partially filling that gap by ascertaining in comparative perspective the basis of the revenue assessment systems prevailing in South India (Karnataka) and Central Java (Yogyakarta) during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. What makes such an undertaking not only desirable from a scholarly point of view but also possible in practice is the near unique finds of virtually untapped original source materials deriving from the respective institutions’ function.
Keywords: Revenue assessment; Land tenure; Inequality; Archival sources; Kaditas; South India; Central Java; Local administrative traditions; Colonial policy
JEL-codes: H71; N35; N45; N95; Q15
30 pages, December 15, 2017
Full text files
cbc1a317-8caf-438c-978d-512edad1a4fb
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Tobias Karlsson ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:luekhi:0169This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:16:07.