Björn Hagströmer (), Richard G. Anderson (), Jane Binner (), Thomas Elger and Birger Nilsson ()
Additional contact information
Björn Hagströmer: School of Business, Stockholm University, Postal: School of Business , Stockholm University, SE-106 91 STOCKHOLM, Sweden
Richard G. Anderson: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Postal: Research Division, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, MO 63166-0442, USA
Jane Binner: Sheffield University
Thomas Elger: Department of Economics, Lund University, Postal: Department of Economics, School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Box 7082, S-220 07 Lund, Sweden
Birger Nilsson: Department of Economics, Lund University, Postal: Department of Economics, School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Box 7082, S-220 07 Lund, Sweden
Abstract: In the Full-Scale Optimization approach the complete empirical financial return probability distribution is considered; and the utility maximizing solution is found through numerical optimization. Using a portfolio choice setting of three UK equity indices we identify several utility functions featuring loss aversion and prospect theory; under which Full-Scale Optimization is a substantially better approach than the mean-variance approach. As the equity indices have return distributions with small deviations from normality; the findings indicate much broader usefulness of Full-Scale Optimization than has earlier been shown. The results hold in and out of sample; and the performance improvements are given in terms of utility as well as certainty equivalents.
Keywords: portfolio choice; utility maximization; full-scale optimization; S-shaped utility; bilinear utility
JEL-codes: G11
32 pages, October 24, 2007
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Iker Arregui Alegria ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2008_001This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:16:09.