Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics
Working Papers,
Lund University, Department of Economics
No 2012:19: Misreporting and Misclassification: Implications for Socioeconomic Disparities in Body-mass Index and Obesity
Åsa Ljungvall (), Ulf-G Gerdtham () and Ulf Lindblad ()
Additional contact information
Åsa Ljungvall: Department of Economics, Lund University, Postal: Department of Economics, School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Box 7082, S-220 07 Lund, Sweden
Ulf-G Gerdtham: Department of Economics, Lund University, Postal: Department of Economics, School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Box 7082, S-220 07 Lund, Sweden
Ulf Lindblad: Dept of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Postal: Dept of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Dept of Public Health and Community Medicine , P.O. Box 454 , SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
Abstract: Body-mass index (BMI), sometimes calculated from objectively measured and sometimes from self-reported weight and height, has become the standard proxy for obesity in social science research. This study deals with the potential problems related to, first, relying on self-reported weight and height to calculate BMI (misreporting), and, second, the concern that BMI is a deficient measure of body fat and elevated health risks (misclassification). Using a regional Swedish sample, we analyze whether socioeconomic disparities in BMI are biased because of misreporting, and whether socioeconomic disparities in the risk of obesity are sensitive to whether BMI or waist circumference is used to define obesity. Education and two income measures are used as socioeconomic indicators. Among women, different educational groups misreport differently, leading to underestimation of the education disparity when using self-reported information. Among men, misreporting is un-related to socioeconomic status, but misclassification is related to education. As a consequence, when estimating the risk of obesity defined using waist circumference, an educational gradient, which is not present when classifying men using BMI, arises. Taken together, female disparities appear more sensitive to whether weight and height are self-reported, whereas male disparities are more sensitive to definition of obesity.
Keywords: body-mass index; waist circumference; obesity; socioeconomic disparity; misreporting; misclassification
30 pages, July 12, 2012
Full text files
WP12_19.pdf
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Prakriti Thami ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
This page generated on 2024-03-09 16:03:09.