Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics

Working Papers,
Lund University, Department of Economics

No 2016:22: Dread and Risk Elimination Premium for the Value of a Statistical Life

Sara Olofsson (), Ulf-G. Gerdtham (), Lars Hultkrantz () and Ulf Persson ()
Additional contact information
Sara Olofsson: The Swedish Institute for Health Economics (IHE), Postal: The Swedish Institute for Health Economics (IHE), Lund, Sweden
Ulf-G. Gerdtham: Department of Economics, Lund University, Postal: Department of Economics, School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Box 7082, S-220 07 Lund, Sweden
Lars Hultkrantz: Örebro University, School of Business, Postal: Örebro University, School of Business, Örebro, Sweden
Ulf Persson: The Swedish Institute for Health Economics (IHE), Postal: The Swedish Institute for Health Economics (IHE), Lund, Sweden

Abstract: The Value of a Statistical Life (VSL) is a widely used measure of the value of mortality risk reduction. Since VSL should reflect preferences and attitudes to risk, there are reasons to believe that it varies depending on the type of risk involved. It has been argued that cancer should be considered a “dread disease”, which supports the use of a “cancer premium”. The objective of this study is to elicit the existence and size of a cancer premium (for pancreatic cancer and multiple myeloma) in relation to road traffic accidents, sudden cardiac arrest and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). Data was collected from 500 individuals in the Swedish general population 50 -74 years old using a web-based questionnaire. Preferences were elicited using the Contingent Valuation method, and a split-sample design was applied to test for scale sensitivity. VSL differs significantly between contexts, being highest for ALS and lowest for road traffic accident. A premium (26-76 %) for cancer was found in relation to road traffic accidents, but not in relation to ALS and sudden cardiac arrest. The premium was higher for cancer with a shorter time from diagnosis to death. Eliminating risk was associated with a premium of around 17 %. Evidence of scale sensitivity was found when comparing WTP for all risks simultaneously. This study shows that there exist a dread premium and risk elimination premium. These factors should be considered when searching for an appropriate value for economic evaluation and health technology assessment.

Keywords: willingness to pay; value of a statistical life; cancer; contingent valuation; risk elimination

JEL-codes: D61; D80; I18; J17

36 pages, September 23, 2016

Full text files

WP16_22 PDF-file Full text

Download statistics

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Iker Arregui Alegria ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2016_022This page generated on 2024-09-17 17:45:06.