Paul Castaneda Dower (), Gunes Gokmen (), Michel Le Breton () and Shlomo Weber ()
Additional contact information
Paul Castaneda Dower: University of Wisconsin-Madison
Gunes Gokmen: Department of Economics, Lund University, Postal: Department of Economics, School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Box 7082, S-220 07 Lund, Sweden
Michel Le Breton: Toulouse School of Economics
Shlomo Weber: New Economic School, Moscow
Abstract: This paper examines the lasting impact of the alignment of African countries during the Cold War on their modern economic development. We find that the division of the continent into two blocs (East/West) led to two clusters of development outcomes that reflect the Cold War’s ideological divide. To determine alignment, we introduce a non-cooperative game of social interactions where each country chooses one of the two existing blocs based on its predetermined bilateral similarities with other members of the bloc. We show the existence of a strong Nash equilibrium in our game and apply the celebrated MaxCut method to identify such a partition. The alignment predicts UN General Assembly voting patterns during the Cold War but not after. Our approach, linking global political interdependence to distinct development paths in Africa, relies on history to extract a micro-founded treatment assignment, while allowing for an endogenous, process-oriented view of historical events.
Keywords: Cold War; Political Alliances; Africa; Blocs; Development Clusters; Strong Nash Equilibrium; Landscape Theory
JEL-codes: C62; C72; F54; F55; N47; N47; O19; O57; Y10
72 pages, June 22, 2021
Full text files
WP21_10 Full text
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Iker Arregui Alegria ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2021_010This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:16:10.