Discussion Paper Series in Economics,
Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics

Abstract: The current understanding about how households respond to price changes in formal childcare is not extensive. This study examines this response through a 1998 reform in Norway that introduced a money transfer to families who did not send their child to childcare. This cash-for-care reform raised the price of formal childcare relative to its alternatives by about 115% for 1–2 year olds but not 3–5 year olds. Using household surveys conducted before and after the reform the analysis reveals that childcare attendance fell by 13.7 percentage points because of the reform. The results also indicate that the most important alternative to formal childcare is parental care. Furthermore, households of low socioeconomic status are more price sensitive, with the main substitute mode of care for this group being parental/relative care, whereas for high socioeconomic status families the substitutes include day parks and nannies as well as parental care.

Keywords: Public Policy; Cash Incentives; Childcare; Difference-in-Difference

JEL-codes: D10; H31; J13

36 pages, October 14, 2016

Full text files

DP20.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y  

Download statistics

• Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Karen Reed-Larsen ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:nhheco:2016_020This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:16:16.