Halvor Mehlum (), Karl-Ove Moene () and Ragnar Torvik ()
Additional contact information
Halvor Mehlum: Dept. of Economics, University of Oslo, Postal: Department of Economics, University of Oslo, P.O Box 1095 Blindern, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
Karl-Ove Moene: Dept. of Economics, University of Oslo, Postal: Department of Economics, University of Oslo, P.O Box 1095 Blindern, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
Ragnar Torvik: Norwegian University og Science and Technology, Postal: Department of Economics, NTNU, N-7491 Trondheim , Norway
Abstract: Countries rich in natural resources constitute both growth losers and growth winners. We claim that the main reason for these diverging experiences is differences in the quality of institutions. More natural resources push aggregate income down, when institutions are grabber friendly, while more resources raise income, when institutions are producer friendly. We test this theory building on Sachs and Warner.s influential works on the resource curse. Our main hypothesis: that institutions are decisive for the resource curse, is conÞrmed. Our results are in sharp contrast to the claim by Sachs and Warner that institutions do not play a role.
Keywords: Natural resources; Institutional quality; Growth; Rent-seeking
JEL-codes: F43
28 pages, June 18, 2003
Full text files
Memo-29-2002.pdf
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Mari Strønstad Øverås ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:osloec:2002_029This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:16:44.