(), Michael Hoel
() and Knut Einar Rosendahl
Mads Greaker: Statstics Norway, Postal: Postboks 8131 Dep., N-0033 Oslo , Norway
Michael Hoel: Dept. of Economics, University of Oslo, Postal: Department of Economics, University of Oslo, P.O Box 1095 Blindern, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
Knut Einar Rosendahl: Norwegian Univeristy of Life Sciences, Postal: Norwegian Univeristy of Life Sciences, Postboks 5003 NMBU, 1432 Ås, Norway
Abstract: Recent literature on biofuels has questioned whether biofuels policies are likely to reduce the negative effects of climate change. Our analysis explicitly takes into account that oil is a non-renewable natural resource. A blending mandate has no effect on total cumulative oil extraction. However, extraction of oil is postponed as a consequence of the renewable fuel standard. Thus, if emissions from biofuels are negligible, the standard will have beneficial climate effects. The standard also reduces total fuel (i.e., oil plus biofuels) consumption initially. Hence, even if emissions from biofuels are non-negligible, a renewable fuel standard may still reduce climate costs. In fact our simulations show that even for biofuels that are almost as emissions-intensive as oil, a renewable fuel standard has beneficial climate effects.
23 pages, April 23, 2014
Full text files
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Mari Strønstad Øverås ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
This page generated on 2018-02-14 10:28:56.