Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics
Ratio Working Papers,
The Ratio Institute
No 61: Is the Law of Reflux Valid? Evidence from Sweden 1878–1913
Per Hortlund
Additional contact information
Per Hortlund: The Ratio Institute, Postal: P.O. Box 5095, SE-102 42 Stockholm, Sweden, and, The Section for Historical Economics and Entrepreneurship, Stockholm School of Economics, P.O. Box 5095, SE-102 42 Stockholm, Sweden
Abstract: In the classical monetary debates, the Banking School held that notes would be equally demand-elastic whether supplied by many or a single issuer. The Free Banking School held that notes would be less demand-elastic if supplied by a single issuer. These assertions have rarely, if ever, been subject to more stringent statistical testing. In this paper I compare the elastic properties of the note stock of the Swed-ish note banking system in 1878–1901 with those of the regime in 1904–1914, when the Bank of Sweden held a note monopoly. Evi-dence suggests that notes did not become less elastic after monopoli-sation, thus lending support to the views of the Banking School.
Keywords: Banking School; Free Banking School; Elastic currency; Clearing mechanism; Note competition; Needs of trade; Law of Reflux; Speed of redemption; Real bills doctrine
JEL-codes: B12; E42; E51; E58; N13; N23
22 pages, January 3, 2005
Full text files
ph_reflux.pdf
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Martin Korpi ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
This page generated on 2022-10-25 15:57:22.