Ratio Working Papers,
The Ratio Institute

Abstract: What are the best ownership and governance arrangements for a natural monopoly facility? There are three broad approaches: (a) private ownership, coupled with arms-length public utility regulation; (b) some form of government (central, state, or local) ownership; and (c) customer or community ownership. While there is a substantial literature comparing outcomes under private and public (i.e., government) ownership, there is relatively little literature comparing private and/or government ownership with customer ownership. One of the obstacles of performance comparison is that different businesses may choose a different price-quality trade-off, making direct comparison impossible. In this study we cut through this problem by comparing customer perceptions of value-for-money. The study is based on interviews of more than 600 randomly selected electricity distribution customers in Sweden, approximately 150 in each ownership category (municipal, customer, private, and state). These distributors are subject to an identical regulatory framework. The results show that those owned directly by customers are perceived to deliver significantly more value for money than those owned by the government or by private investors. These results lend weight to the view that a well-governed customer-owned utility may lead to better outcomes than other owners"

Keywords: Electricity distribution; Value for money; Ownership; Customer satisfaction; Sweden

JEL-codes: L32; L94; Q48

Language: English

26 pages, January 18, 2024

Full text files

wp-372.pdf  Full text

Download statistics

• The Ratio Institute
• Ordering Working Papers
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Martin Korpi ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:ratioi:0372This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:16:55.