Ratio Working Papers,
The Ratio Institute

Abstract: Insider activism—where bureaucrats use discretionary power to advance own ideological goals—has significant implications for regulatory stability and property rights security. Using the Swedish forestry industry as a case study, the purpose of this study is to investigate if insider activism affects the Swedish forestry sector and how such possible regulatory uncertainty influences economic decision-making. Assembled survey data suggest that forest owners perceive regulatory enforcement as unpredictable, leading to defensive actions such as premature harvesting to preempt restrictive future regulations. To explain these patterns, we apply public choice theory and a game-theoretic approach, demonstrating how bureaucratic drift, regulatory ratcheting, and time-inconsistency problems contribute to persistent distortions in forestry policies. Policy wise, the findings emphasize the need for judicial review, regulatory impact assessments, and clearer legislative mandates to reduce enforcement uncertainty and improve institutional trust. This research advances discussions on bureaucratic incentives, regulatory capture, and legal certainty in environmental policy.

Keywords: Insider Activism; Bureaucratic Influence; Bureaucratic Drift; Legal Uncertainty; Property Rights; Sustainable Development; Swedish Forest Industry

JEL-codes: D73; D78; H77; H83; Q23

Language: English

30 pages, June 4, 2025

Full text files

wp-383.pdf  Working Paper No. 383 Insider activism in the forest industry: An empirical public choice analysis

Download statistics

• The Ratio Institute
• Ordering Working Papers
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Martin Korpi ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:ratioi:0383This page generated on 2025-06-04 16:56:00.