() and Bengt Kriström
Per-Olov Johansson: Stockholm School of Economics and CERE, Postal: Handelshögskolan i Stockholm, Box 6501, 113 83 STOCKHOLM
Bengt Kriström: CERE, Postal: Centre for Environmental and Resource Economics, Dept. of Forest Economics, SLU, S-901 83 Umeå
Abstract: Conventional cost-benefit rules typically assume that the alternative to the project under evaluation is “doing nothing” or “business as usual”. In this note we contrast this approach to one where the alternative is to provide another environmental good or service. We show that this approach, which draw on methods like Habitat Equivalency Analysis and Resource Equivalency Analysis, imply that all cost and benefit items can be estimated using market prices. This is in sharp contrast to the conventional approach which typically require the use of controversial stated preference techniques to estimate the willingness to pay for non-market goods.
10 pages, February 3, 2012
Full text files
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Mona Bonta Bergman ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
This page generated on 2020-02-16 18:57:54.