CERE Working Papers,
CERE - the Center for Environmental and Resource Economics

Abstract: Incomplete information may be one reason why some households do not invest in energy efficiency even though it would benefit them to do so. Energy performance certificates (EPCs) have been promoted to overcome such information shortages. In this paper, we investigate whether EPCs together with mandatory home energy audits make households more likely to invest in energy efficiency. Our study takes advantage of the mandatory nature of the EPCs to avoid the potential selection bias problem that typically applies to studies using voluntary energy audits as the treatment. Our treatment group consists of single-household dwellings in Sweden sold from 2008, i.e., when EPCs became legally required in connection with sales of residential buildings, to 2015; while the control group consists of houses sold between 2002 and 2008, i.e., without an EPC. The results show that there is no statistically significant treatment effect for most of the measures that a household can take to improve the energy performance of their house.

Keywords: energy performance certificate (EPC); home energy audits; quasi-natural experimental design; incomplete information; investment decision; energy efficiency gap; policy evaluation

JEL-codes: D83; Q41; Q48

27 pages, September 26, 2018

Full text files

papers.cfm?abstract_id=3255891  Full text

Download statistics

• CERE - the Center for Environmental and Resource Economics
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Mona Bonta Bergman ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:slucer:2018_008This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:17:07.